Boston Court Performing Arts Center
In the current climate where a brash young movie star on the rise declares no one cares anymore about ballet and opera, it takes a large set of you-know-whats for an intimate theatre company struggling as most are to stay afloat to present the world premiere of an intricately cerebral and low-lying untried play about a pair of research scientists dedicated to studying cephalopods.
Then again, there’s strength in numbers and the fact that my old home-away-from-home the Boston Court joined forces with two other like-minded and dedicated theatre companies to bring Weston Gaylord’s magical Octopus’s Garden to life despite the odds might just mark, as Circle X artistic director Jen Kays mentioned to me opening night, the wave of the future.
It was Circle X that first discovered Octopus’s Garden, I believe, and approached Jessica Kubzansky of the Boston Court and Jessica Hanna of Outside In Theatre to suggest this monumentally serendipitous three-way collaboration—and it was a match made in heaven.
Simply put, the potentially easy to overlook and somewhat analytical little drama could have been a disappointing liability but by pooling their resources and unstoppable enthusiasm, this underdog of an artistic risk may just prove to be LA’s earliest candidate for production of the year.
Lars (Tim Cummings) is a typically nerdy marine biologist who has dedicated his life to studying the intelligence of octopuses, those mysterious creatures of the sea with a decentralized nervous systems, three hearts and, if he can prove his hypothesis to be true, the ability to conjure advanced thinking that could rival—if not surpass—our own.
Lars works alongside a passionate much younger clinician named Tara (Kacie Rogers), who shares his enthusiasm but is intensely frustrated by his reserved nature in trying to make discoveries about how the molluscan class brain creates thought.
Tara secretly fabricates a homemade but complex musical apparatus (hats off to prop designer Nicole Barnardini) that she lowers into the stage-length tank of Sylvia, a giant Pacific octopus Lars discovered while scuba diving and brought back to their lab to study. Sylvia is clearly an astonishingly sentient creature who quickly became the major focus of the scientists’ research.
Tara goes home but when she returns the next morning and downloads what their empyreal charge has created in her absence, everything in her world and the world of Lars instantly changes. Sylvia has composed music unlike anything ever produced, music so labyrinthine, so jarringly sublime, so unrestrained and evocative that it goes far beyond anything anyone human has ever conjured.
When Tara is forced to share Sylvia’s composition with the ever-cautious Lars, it instantly brings her usually emotionally stunted colleague to tears and, when they both subsequently try to listen to the music we all know that brings us pleasure, it sounds harsh and scratchy and weirdly discordant.
They bring in a passionate young hopeful composer-in-training (Vincent R. Williams), someone Tara met and subsequently rejected on a blind internet date. Not only does Lucas have the same reaction to Sylvia’s “music,” it destroys his dreams, finding the unearthly celestial music so inconceivably stunning that suddenly he can no longer write music himself.
It soon becomes a struggle to decide what the next step is, whether or not to share the researchers’ discovery with the world. What Sylvia has generated, they realize, has the potential to alter the entire specter of human consciousness if shared with the world, as it just might be capable of destroying what we know as human passions as drastically as it has for Lucas.
Gaylord’s almost equally indescribably transcendent tale takes us to places hard to imagine, places where passages of what might be singled out as too right-minded and scientifically esoteric instead keep us riveted and on the edge of our seats.
That’s because what Octopus’s Garden explores down deep (if that phrase doesn’t seem too oceanic) is what constitutes being human and leaves us wondering if we as a species are as truly superior to everything else in our wildly mystifying universe we pretend too often to understand.
Bottomline, however, I don’t believe there’s any way this many-sided yet gentle treatise on the misconceptions naturally inherent in our human condition could succeed without the glorious team of artists who have conspired to bring this unprecedented, rule-defying work of theatrical art to fruition.
There’s no argument that director Jessica Kubzansky is one of LA theatre’s most prolific stargazers but this time out, she surpasses everything that has come before it, delivering a hauntingly surreal work of art unlike anything offered before.
Her evocative perception of Gaylord’s unparalleled chimerical modern folk tale makes this all come together splendidly, something clearly echoed by a worldclass design team. It’s almost as though together these passionate visionaries somehow manage to astral project their eager audience into a preternatural place to experience an almost Homeric event—and in a 99-seat theatre at that. It’s as though we’re watching a contextural 3-D cinematic epic without the glasses.
Francois-Pierre Couture’s set is minimal but gorgeously spectural, the versatile Boston Court stage dominated by Sylvia’s gigantic neon-framed tank and accentuated by a collection of hanging square Japanese lantern-esque lamps to add to the abstract sense of design so jarringly juxtaposed with the reality of the researchers’ otherwise drab and antiseptic laboratory.
Karyn D. Lawrence’s lighting is equally otherworldly, as is the atmospheric sound design by Noel Nichols that occasionally feels so underwater that we should all be handed scuba equipment when entering the theatre.
It takes a trio of dynamic performers to hold their own in the grand scheme of things that conspire to bring such theatrical sorcery to life—and these three performers do so seamlessly.
Rogers is particularly powerful as the wildly passionate, sometimes overstepping Tara, delivering the production’s most arresting and richly multifaceted performance, while Williams is heartbreaking as the hotblooded young virtuoso whose hopes and dreams collapse before him.
Cummings has the difficult task of finding the sweet spot between Lars’ lifelong fervor to make important scientific breakthroughs and struggle to do so in small analytical baby steps. His one breakout monologue as he loses himself describing finding Sylvia while on a dive is nothing short of enthralling.
Still, ironically these three fine actors are limited here by their humanity, overshadowed by Octopus’s Garden’s grandly unique and omnipresent non-human performer: Sylvia herself. As brought to life by puppet designer extraordinaire Emory Royston, who also choreographs the creature’s undulating underwater ballet, Sylvia is the unexpected star of the show.
The continuous movements of the graceful replicated octopus are executed by three performers dressed all in black—Zachary Bones, Perry Daniel, and Danielle McPhaul—manipulating long poles reminiscent of classic Thai shadow puppets. Their work and the direction of Royston deserve special honors at year’s end.
And speaking of honors, how do the members of the Pulitzer Prize for Drama nominating committee find their potential candidates? As I understand it, the drama jury each year reviews scripts by American playwrights produced not only in New York but in regional theatres across the country, taking into account the particular productions from which they emerged.
If any play this year deserves consideration by the Pulitzer board, I for one wholeheartedly would nominate Weston Gaylord and his enchanting, gripping, exceptionally mesmeric Octopus’s Garden, a thought-provoking study in what constitutes being a conscious and sentient being just as worthy to be alive as we are.